>>330539054chan is full of transphobic sexist retards who haven't seen a pussy outside of cartoon schoolchildren, why would you give a shit what we have to say?
I don't think I'd see you and assume "TRANS GIRL TRANS GIRL", and that's as someone who actively seeks them out.
Personally, I think you're on the tier of "I wouldn't assume youre trans, but if you said you were born a man, I don't think I'd be surprised, either". You look like a cis woman, but you're not so highly feminine that a trans girl couldn't possibly have your body type. You genuinely just look like a woman who isnt HIGHLY feminine (that doesnt mean unattractive, by the way! You look fine).
there are certain "limits" for trans girls. Trans girls can look like cis women with surgery and pills, but they can't really have hourglass figures or be hyperfeminine some cis girls. They can look like cis women, but they can't have jessica rabbit proportions. The problem is that because of that, NOT having jessica rabbit proportions or very normal things some but not all cis women have are a "tell" for being trans by online dumbasses who have nothing better to do. Said people have rarely seen naked women irl, so they don't understand how wide female bodies can vary.
As someone who has seen such bodies in person, online, etc, I'd say your body looks female. Even if I did think it was trans, I'd still assume you'd had surgery done and were very lucky and pass as cis very well. That said, certain behaviors, voices, clothing CAN give the idea that you're trans. If jessica rabbit wore jeans and a male shirt, she'd still look female. But if you wear super masculine clothes, and have the chest as the only giveaway, I can see how some would see you as trans. That's not a bad thing though, it just means you have the option of being a traditionally cute cis girl, or of getting super ripped and having a gigachad body or tomboy thing. It's not good or bad.
tl;dr its just the rectangle body, but you still look cis
