>>35550285>is simply factually wrong and can be easily disproven not even by studying economy but simply history of history of economies. I have yet to address the elephant in the room that economists don't actually usually talk about "capitalism" at all, and that the term has no canonical definition to begin with. Worse, again, nowhere does the distribution of finite resources even imply economics.
>When speaking of the example you give it only accoutns for a part of capitalism which is the rationalization of productionyou don't even understand the example then. I could easily modify the example to not include any notion of work or production of any kind.
I could spend the next 12+ hours slowly leading you along like the disabled child you act like but that's a lost cause. I am not giving you any more of the precious commodity that is my time in exchange for your drivel. Human patience by the way would be an excellent example of an emotional response following the same mechanics I talked about in my original post. But you will dismiss that.
>Yeah ... a system.of course there could be many interesting things said about your conflation of the two, but honestly, you are just the average coastie subhuman to busy with being right to actually entertain foreign ideas and trying to make them work for you. Your understanding is limited, and you have no interest in entertaining foreign thought, too busy showcasing your undergrad economics dunning kruger powers.
