>>4808698>Because it literally ignored the teacher make him him look like an accessory while making look the NTR as if it was vanilla.What? Even if a husband doesn't show up, if some guy was fucking the wife, it's NTR.
You fucks would say the same if it was a fat guy doing it.
>a jock literally fucking someone's girlfriend by BLACKMAIL is "vanilla"Fuck off.
>Not my fault the author sugar-coated it that even the teacher doesn't gives a shit at the end and congratulated the couple.What? That wasn't what was said at the end.
This guy got it right
>>4808756 on what the translation was.
>Also, the guy who greentexted got it wrong, too.What was wrong with what I said? Even if no breaking up happens, that's still netorare. No one would complain if the jock was a fat or old guy.
Actually, I never said anything about breaking up with anybody.
