>>4406791Anon, are you trying to suggest 50% of the posters having issues is not indicative?
When a webm is done correctly, exactly 0 people have problems with it, how often have you seen such discussion in here before?
I also tried to view them from my mobile phone and it says they're corrupted, the one who posted them must've been new at it and messed something up.
There's nothing shameful about it, no need to get so defensive.
