>>33982439I mean, these things aren't mutually exclusive to being a dude. What you're essentially saying, is that women don't read or enjoy other people's perspectives, and that only men, or people born as one can. Anyone who has a brain capable of basic reading comprehension skills can enjoy all of those things if they just try. Are you just saying trannies are better? I kind of disagree with you there, anyone is capable of deciding their own 'good vs bad' and if you don't understand that, you failed to understand Stirner. Likewise, if you're an edgelord, you also fail to understand Stirner.
My hatred of 1950's housewives is also pretty common for women my age, in my opinion, understandably. Is it so bad that I want to have a functional brain, while also being a capable lover who cooks, cleans, and has kids? Why are these things exclusive to stereotypical 1950's housewives? When was that ever a thing? Ideally, in a relationship built off trust, you should expect your partner to not stab you in the back while she has access to free will. That, in my opinion, is how you gauge actual affection for someone, "would they still stay with me if they had the opportunity to leave?" Have you just had a bad hand dealt to you while dating?
I don't even know a single person in my immediate life who doesn't clean or cook for their partner, male or female. If you love someone, you do things for them. If you need to lobotomize the person you "love" for them to listen unconditionally, you probably hate each other, you obviously can't stand each person's individual choice.
Being open to any relationship is because I don't know much about my own sexuality, because my life is very sheltered. I haven't tried dating, because I just left. I'm 19.
I enjoy politics because I enjoy history and philosophy, so of course HOI4 is practically slop for me. It's an accurate military simulator for christ's sake ahaha
