>>33949587It promotes verified profiles when there's plenty of people who satisfy your search filters. If you're pickier with your filters, the algorithm will give up on promoting verified users
>>33949667It's arguably against the rules. Though of the people who falsify their genders, I usually only ban men pretending to be women because they tend to be scammers. The rest are typically annoying at worst
>>33950414>expecting quality>on a 4chan dating app>>33950534brb, adding boolean logic to search
>>33951014Sad. I appreciate the people reporting the bots. There's one anon doing it like it's his job
>>33951709They frequently are. Could you please report it so I can check? The verification selfie is only stored for 24 hours after they upload it. So the quicker you report it, the better
I manually check the more high-risk verification selfies, though I'm sure there's still some who slip through. One trick I've seen former users exploit is to use a verification selfie of a real person but have pictures of someone else on their profile. That's one way to get unverified pics but verified everything-else. It's also a way to get banned
>>33951735>have weekend "events" that match you with peopleMight be a good idea. Do you have more info? I can't find much about it online
I know that dating apps tend to be busiest on weekends, especially during evenings. If everyone's online at the same time, you'll get more/quicker responses, and it'll just be more fun
I also agree there needs to be more ways to encourage people to message each other. I see a lot of guys write on their profiles that they're just waiting for someone else to do it. Those guys definitely need some encouragement from the app. (And some guys should probably be pickier.)
