>>21710344I believe
>>21708963 was making what we call a “joke.” They take on various forms. In this case, it’s a statement that to a child or autistic retard would appear to be a complaint, but isn’t meant to be taken seriously. It’s called being facetious. Tongue-in-cheek, if you will. Now what you do is reply with something along the lines of, “I was being facetious too, that’s the joke!” That’s what we call damage control. You do this because you’re embarrassed that you got called out as a child and/or autistic retard.
