>>20561577Let’s break it down, from one frying model to the other (yes I work as a fetish model but for obvious reasons won’t disclose my name here):
Extremely bland pictures - Every picture looks the same, with the same lighting, same pose, same boring facial expression, extremely boring makeup (of which she only knows how to do the one it seems...), same hairstyle and she obviously finds it very boring. Also: Skip the glasses when you’re modelling, get contacts. They ruin the entire look and makes her look silly. How are people supposed to take you seriously if you’re posing as a “domme” when your pose is off and your glasses scream “nerdy”?
Horrendous photoshop work, no creases anywhere on any of her outfits and no marks on her skin or such... obviously photoshopped to make her look “doll-like” which removes the personality of the picture. Also, her outfits may be m2m, but there still is creasing, no outfit is 100% crease free, let alone ALL of hers but no one else’s.
False claims of content on paid sites. Her OF and Patreon claims are stupid and obviously just there to make her cash. She cares little to nothing about her followers and is only chasing that big buck.
Goes silent for months then comes back thinking it’s all work as usual - Strengthens my argument that she just takes the money and runs with it.
Doesn’t credit the photographer, editor or the manufacturers of the clothes she’s wearing, instead watermarking everything with her own logo. Unless she has some standing contract with the people involved where they sign off the rights as the picture is taken, the model doesn’t own the picture and is not allowed by law to claim so. Even so, you’re required by law to always include who you worked with, even if you own the rights. I don’t think the manufacturer of her outfits like being left out, and she does NIT create them herself, as stated on a livestream where she refused to disclose it.
