>Nordic: 3-10. Often plain, sometimes rather ugly, but ones that are very fair are some of the most beautiful girls on the planet >Celtic/Anglo: 1-7. Most are obese and bullish with bad teeth, but occasionally they are modestly attractive. They have strangely rufus complexions >Slavic/Uralic: 2-10. I’ve seen Slavs and Finns who were rather hideous, but not quite British hideous. But most of them are very pretty, like Nordics but with flatter noses. But sometimes it’s hard to tell which ones are JB or not >North Med: 4-9. They are a tad overrated, but you got to admit there are tons of sexy Meds, though Balkan Slavs and Albanians usually aren’t real lookers, but they don’t tend to be hideous either >Turkic: 1-8. Most “Turks” from Turkey are an obscene admixture of Arab, Greek, and a tiny sliver of actual Turk. Most Central Asian Turks are often rather bland, but hot Kazakhs aren’t completely out of the ordinary >North Asian/Eskimo: 1-10. There aren’t many bland looking girls in Arctic and Subarctic parts of the world, most are either really ugly or really hot East Asia: 4-10. A lot of them are really sexy, but a lot of them are kind of bland as well. They almost always have nice complexions and are rarely hideous >Indochina: 5-10. Often rather pretty, but sometimes kind of pug-faced, but rarely ever ugly in it’s truest form >Malaya: 2-9. Some Filipinos and Indonesians are almost as hideous as the ugliest Brits, but some of them are beautiful. But the vast majority are plain >South Asia: 1-10. Girls from the Himalayan countries are a hit or miss, and girls from Bangladesh are often quite attractive. But most Indians and Pakis are very ugly on average >Native American/Latina: 1-10. Like Articans, either really hot or really ugly, no in between >Arab/Berber: 1-10. Most Arabs are uggos, but Berber girls are often very beautiful Negro: 1-7. Most negresses are uggos, but sexy ones exist. I just don’t fuck them because they are just chimp furries