>>39753605>which necessarily excludes some cis women. What is a cis woman and how am I excluding some of them?
>i do not want to abolish gender. i enjoy it when people classify me as a woman If you can't present a definition of woman that you think society should use, that is de facto gender abolitionism. If men can pay women's sports, and men can go to women's prisons, and men can receive women's scholarships, etc, then it doesn't mean anything to be classified as a woman.
>my point is that it's all vibe based abstract categories that are fuzzy around the edges and there will never be a hard definition that will exclude me while not also excluding some cis women Again, what is a cis woman? If you can define cis woman, then wouldn't that definition meet your conditions of excluding you but including all cis women? And if you can't define cis woman, then how can you say my definition excludes some of them?
I stand by that a woman is a person born with ovaries.
