>>39745041Whites. Simple as. I find them most frequently to be attractive, and to be the top tier of attractiveness. People say East Asian trans mog and are more passable but they are faceblind. East Asian men don't look like women, East Asian women look like men. Asians are small but stocky and they have long torsos with short legs. They have flat, boxy heads. They don't have curves. Yellow fever is a mental illness whether it's normal guys or chasers.
Some mixed trans look really good though. Asians mixed with white can balance things out. Some mixed black and white trans can look good too.
>>39745099Being small is not enought to be feminine. A ten year old boy is small, that doesn't make him feminine. Femininity is multifaceted. If you took a six foot tall European woman with wide, child bearing hips and bit tits, she's going to mog 5'5 Truong from Philipines who has no tits, no hips and looks like a rectangle. The smaller woman is not inherently more feminine.
But you might say that such curves don't apply to trans women. So would East Asian androgyny give them more advantage in that space? No. They still have boxy faces and short legs. White trans girls at least generally have nice legs. And while it is less common for whites to be as angrogynous as Asians, the ones who are really are. And there are even white trans girls that look properly feminine facially. Fuck, these days there are youngshit white trans starting to have feminine shaped bodies. But Asians never will, because even their cis women don't.
(this is all an exageration, some Asian women do actually have feminine faces and forms, but it is much rarer and they generally are not frequently as feminine as white women, and I have literally never seen an Asian trans girl I consider truly feminine)
