>>39723462At this point everyone has gone so far past the original clinical observations of AGP, that classic presentations of AGP are considered trutrans. Most modern presentations of transness are just purely fetishistic and would have been classified as transvestism, rather than as part of any transsexual typology.
That's the problem with broad umbrellas and evolving language. Sometimes it really is a slippery slope.
So technically no, it's not even agpbrained, it's transvestitebrained.
