>>39356132I think you have me confused with someone else in this thread, or perhaps you're confused about the point I'm making. Maybe you feel that you have to double down on everything or terfism is legitimate.
All I'm asking you is what Dworkin's writings were concerning trans people, because I thought it would be interesting to read more about it. I have never heard of Marsha P. Johnson being described (at least at the time, by herself or by anyone else) as "transgender", I assume that's who you're talking about. I don't think it would be controversial today to say she fell under that umbrella, but that wasn't the word at the time. This may or may not be news to you, perhaps you would consider this statement to be an attack on your rights, but people thought about these things somewhat differently than the way they do now. Even people who we would today call "transgender".
If you want to take the question as an attack on your rights, I guess there's no point in discussing further.
