>>32675577political compass is fucking useless.
any nuanced leftist will be libertarian left. Even hardcore stalinists, because even though theyre fine with gulags and shit, thats all in SERVICE of obtaining a libleft society. The only thing liblefts and authlefts disagree on is HOW to get to there.
librights and authrights agree FAR MORE with eachother than liblefts and librights do. LIbrights and authrights believe more or less the same shit in practice, except that one thinks taxes are cringe. Liblefts and librights on the other hand, have basically nothing in common.
Even without these flaws its still a shit test because 90% of people in western society (the majority of people who give this test credence) SHOULD be placed in authright. That doesnt mean the test PLACES them there, but thats due to the fact the test is bullshit.
Some questions are just straight up not (implicitly) political. For example: " There is now a worrying fusion of information and entertainment." Not only is this not necessarily political, this isn't even really an opinion. This is just OBJECTIVELY true. We can argue to what DEGREE this is true, but people have been blending info and entertainment since forever. Ignoring that, the fact that "edutainment games" exist means the only correct answer to this question is "agree or strongly agree". Which also doesn't make sense, how strongly are you supposed to agree with a fact? Even if this was political, what side is this supposed to lean? left, right, auth, lib? Whichever answer it is, the answer is wrong because ANY political position could argue this.
another example: "Our race has many superior qualities, compared with other races."
This is bullshit because while AGREEING with it is 100% a political thing, disagreeing with it isnt necessarily a political thing. If I think racism is bad, it doesnt suddenly make me more communist or whatever. Not being racist isnt a fucking political statement (unless youre typing #blm on twitter).
