>>5120503>even if someone has given consent, they have the right to revoke itSure, I accept your claim because I believe in bodily autonomy. However the revocation of consent does not mean that the act was rape until that point; instead, it only means that the act, IF it continues after consent is removed, becomes rape. Or if the act transitions to something for which consent was not given (e.g. she don't want buttstuff and he sticks it in the pooper, that's rape). Likewise, a later endowing of consent does not absolve the previous portions of the act of being rape.
Now, if you mean post-act removal of consent, then I disagree. I can see the argument when consent was given under duress, but even then I don't think that's actual consent (which we can discuss further).
