>>4916032No.
It requires some combination of beefy guy and scrawny girl to add up, which means it's uncommon to even be practically doable for any extended period.
Beyond that, unless it's a particular fetish piece for one or both parties, it doesn't really do anything special, besides lining the dick up with the g-spot, like any from behind style does.
It can be more doable and even practical if you are intending for some DP, but even then, relies on the girl being flexible enough to not find it uncomfortable.
It's worth noting that a a sling or other proper rigging can make this more doable if you absolutely must try it and the equation of beefy boi and scrawny gril doesn't add up.
>>4916402This one's entirely up to the flexibility of the girl. If she's comfortable with putting her legs up, then it does actually have some special use, as it maximizes your potential depth; which can either be desirable if you're smaller and/or she's deeper, or else undesirable if the opposite is true. Unless she is one of the rare few women that actually enjoys cervix stimulation.
As a side benefit, it's usually one of the better positions for passively stimulating the clit, but it's still not as good as giving it attention with your fingers/strapping a vibe to it.
As far as "porn" positions go, it's actually not that bad if you aren't pushing someone beyond their comfort zone, plus you can maintain eye contact, which can be important for some women.
>>4966114Again, assuming the guy is flexible enough, this one isn't terrible. It doesn't have as many perks as the mating press, but the Amazon Press is one of the most powerfully male-sub positions out there, which can make it desirable for some couples. As icing, it exposes the shaft nicely, so a motivated woman can do more intensive shaft-working and angle play, which is fun for both parties.
