>>39479202Yea, there were only the negative connotations of the passive role present in roman law. No one bullied the hairy masc dom daddies back then, nor do anyone bullies them now.
>Homosexuality in ancient Rome differed markedly from the contemporary West. Latin lacks words that would precisely translate "homosexual" and "heterosexual".[1] The primary dichotomy of ancient Roman sexuality was active/dominant/masculine and passive/submissive/feminine.You must be fun at parties, you sperg.
