>>2530071Did that agent tell you if they meant shooting with other men or shooting with the same guy, but larping as other men/not promoting yourself as a couple? My understanding is that the former has a much bigger ceiling, but it's also a grind that often requires traveling and a bunch of preplanning. You need to be dropping new vids regularly and it often spirals into more degen stuff quickly. If these girls can't be bothered to post on Twitter, Reddit and Instagram a few times a day, I wouldn't trust them with that. It's also a one-way road. You can't really do "collabs" and then deescalate to more vanilla material.
Larping as single probably helps with the delusional "maybe I have a chance" demo. That's the reason so many Twitch thots don't mention they're married or have a boyfriend.
My advice for a vanilla creator is a mix of nudes and solo videos, with some BG content (if you're monogamous) as a high price special. To keep that content fresh, do role plays, shoot in different locations, costumes, etc. If they're open to working with other girls, GG collabs make sense, especially for SFW promos. Livestreams are also an easy way to milk pay pigs, too. None of this should be challenging to make happen.
>Otherwise, sticking to mostly vanilla wmwf (wmbf too?) bg content sounds better just for the broader appeal.I know of popular WMAF, WMLF, obviously white couples and even pajeetas, but I honestly can't really name a successful WMBF porn couple. That combo seems popular on Reddit, so definitely shill there if it's what you're making.
Black girls seem to struggle to get non-black fans, especially if they don't shoot (interracial) BG content. I've seen a few girls who did non-monogamous BG stuff with black men then try to build a white fanbase and fail. Largely for the same reason GG content sells poorly for women who largely do BG vids. Their primary audience is black and a bone or two isn't enough to reach white ones.
