The uglier someone is, the more sexually risky they are. They aren't just phenotypically ugly, they have absolutely disgusting genetics.
They've been marked as "prone to disease" by nature and should be avoided. Attractive people might take more risks, but only where it is necessary. They also have better risk analysis. Ugly people have shitty risk analysis and therefore take unnecessary risks like having unprotected sex with someone who has an infection (making them more ugly).
If a phenotypically attractive person gets a disease, they will become genetically ugly through epigenetics.
People with diseases stink (their immune system smells like shit) and it's usually physically apparent based on skin infections or some other nasty shit (check their nails, eyes, and mouth).
People who can't smell someone's shitty immune system or notice other identifiers are probably ugly too.
>>1249807probably has a disgusting face (asymmetric as fuck), overweight, probably smells like garbage (doesn't matter how many times he showers), probably has some form of skin disease tinea versicolor disgusting fuck
>>1249066so you're embarrassed about being degenerate
>>1250744So basically you're ugly and/or have AIDS and you're in denial about one or both.
--
For any ugly persons information: just don't have sex. You're only going to make your shitty genetics worse. No amount of SJW moralfagging is going to make you attractive or acceptable by nature. Just because our society has become more accepting doesn't mean you deserve a free pass to spread disease.
If you really want to have sex, try virtual reality you disgusting piece of shit.
