>>1248504>op here>this thread was perfect until (You)1. Please, explain how a few "imperfect" pictures make it impossible for others to post "perfect" pictures.
2. So what's wrong with
>>1248359,
>>1248312,
>>1248297 or
>>1248299 ? No one seems to like them and I can't see why.
>thought the word moobs was enough to keep the tranny and gyno freaks away3. I didn't know 4chan threads were about OP mind reading.
4. Are you absolutely sure there's nothing else besides trannies and gynos that you would like to keep away from this thread? PIC RELATED.
5. At this point, I won't be too surprised if you respond "Yes, no Africans and no Jews please". Do you have no decency or even shame?
>>1248402>Plus nobody wants to see that hereArgument invalid on several counts.
6. A self-fulfilling prophecy. If we post enough stuff that you don't like, this board will eventually get populated by people who like it.
7. Am I "nobody"?
8. So you don't want gender equality???
9. This thread is about pecs, not men. The fact that it exists on /hm/ is coincidental and probably related to the fact that muscle pecs exist mostly on men. "Mostly"... not "exclusively". Humans don't need to help "mostly" become "exclusively". There is no need to "help" nature in the way of reducing a minority to zero. Minorities exist for a reason: they fulfill the role of a diversity reserve AKA "long tail",* so they can become a majority one day. They are not meant to be exterminated, as fascists would fancy.
10. Female muscle pecs don't differ from male muscle pecs more than Jewish pecs differ from indigenous German pecs. Example:
>>1248285. (Not even best.) So why is it acceptable for a pec lover to dislike and expressly disapprove of female pecs? How is it less evil than racism? Are gays even SJW?
11. Judging by how no one else is posting ITT, nobody wants to see anything else either.
You can't beat the power nor the number of my arguments. I'm gayer than thou.
*)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_tail 
